丁格利後遺症~ i robot
對科技的質疑 對舊世界的追憶
人與機械關係的辯證
在交出論文一年多後
仍如幽靈般的出沒在腦中
神經衰弱的種種現象
都是丁格利所帶來的
第一次看機械公敵時
興奮的有如找到引用文獻
一見三大安全法則
更覺得邏輯的矛盾有趣
唉唷 畢業前怎麼沒看完咧
不然就可以引用藍寧博士的話囉
There have always been ghosts in the machine.
Random segments of code that have grouped
together to form unexpected protocols.
Unanticipated, these free radicals engender
questions of free will, creavity and even the
nature of what we might call the soul.
Why is it that when some robots are left in darkness,
they will seek out the light?
Why is it when robots are stored in an empty space
they will group together rather than stand alone?
How do we explain this behavior?
Random segments of code? Or is it something more?
When does a perceptual schematic become consciousness?
When does a difference engine become the search for truth?
When does a personality simulation become the bitter mote of a soul?
Dr. Alfred Lanning, 2035
何時知覺的圖解程式成為意識?
何時判讀差異的裝置成為真理的追尋?
何時人性的模擬成為一絲苦澀的靈魂?
感人啊! 藍寧老頭子,比穆納里的機械主義宣言寫的更好.
Shorten Url
Recommend to Front page
精神糧食[2]